Breaking Ranks: A CEO Goes Rogue

Manager’s Samizdat

Here’s an interesting paste from an article in today’s Los Angeles Times by Kim Murphy, about the ongoing port occupations:

… In Portland, meanwhile, where an Occupy demonstration shut down two major loading terminals Monday morning, demonstrators regrouped by late afternoon and headed toward another terminal.

“Now we are headed to Terminal 4, which is about a three-mile walk, and we’re going to shut it down,” said James Douglas Gless, president of a land development and environmental engineering consulting firm in Oregon City, who joined the protests.

Gless said he decided to participate because of growing frustration with the political process.

“I’m a 56-year-old corporate president. The last three years were good to me. But I’ve got two kids that have got to grow up in a country that has been stolen by these huge national and multinational corporations,” he told the Times. “What else can we do? We want our votes again.”

Amen, brother.  I’m a 51-year-old academic administrator with three kids, a mortgage, and all the other bric-a-brac of a crumbling educated middle-class existence, and I couldn’t agree more.  I bet he’s got an MBA.  What?  Shut up, vote, work hard, pay your taxes and everything will be OK?  Yeah, right.

All the same, all that said, we can’t give up on democracy, either.  Look at what Rep. Deutsch and (my) Sen. Bernie Sanders are doing to advance a proposed constitutional amendment to overturn unlimited corporate personhood.  This deserves our support as well.  To para-quote Ronald Reagan, “Legislate, but occupy!”

For more information:

Marley’s Ghost’s Warning to the 1%

With Christmas approaching, this seemed worth reminding us of.

“Business!” cried the Ghost, wringing its hands again. “Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence were all my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!”

- Lament of the ghost of Jacob Marley, Scrooge’s deceased business partner, in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol (1843)

Here’s the scene from a 1984 film version of A Christmas Carol; this dialog starts around minute 7:  Scene from A Christmas Carol

Saturday follow-up to “Truth or Duh” – “Americans for Prosperity” Revealed for What they Are

Thanks to Gary Flomenhoft at Vermont Commons for the link to this article, “Koch Political Group Brags About Bullying GOP Lawmakers Into Denying Climate Science.”

Here, Koch Brothers-financed Americans for Prosperity president Tim Phillips boasts about AFP’s successes in driving Washington politicians away from support for climate change mitigation and green energy, and into the sleazy embrace of climate change denial. This proves a key point of my blog post yesterday: a dominant majority of politicians, economic policy makers, and (MBA-bedecked) financial industry people are currently standing in the way of reasonable federal energy policy, support for progressive state energy policy, and private investment to develop a post-fossil economy. There is so much money and influence at stake that these puppets are selling their own integrity, scientific truth, country, and children’s futures down the river.

Really, it’s that simple now. For such an outrageous betrayal of their credibility, respected positions in society, education, the public communication spectrum, and civic duty, the likes of Tim Phillips and others named in the above article should not be surprised if mobs demand that they be dragged out of their fancy offices, tarred, feathered, and set out in stocks in the locations recently vacated by occupationists in major cities, and have eggs, rotten vegetables, excrement, and other appropriate matter thrown at them, because what they are inflicting on this nation is no better.

There is no other “theory” that works here.  It’s purely and simply:

Huge Power + Threats to Huge Power = Huge Efforts at All Costs to Preserve Power

Unfortunately for us, this huge power derives from the fossil fuel complex, which is bad for all of us in balance.

Don’t they teach them that stuff in MBA programs?

OccupyMBA!

Truth or Duh – Why Wall Street Doesn’t Do Climate Science

Jeremy Grantham of GMO came to our MBA program to speak last week.  The title of his talk was “Irrational Avoidance of the Unpleasant: Perspectives on Investing, Resource Limitations & Global Warming.”  It was a fantastic, well-attended talk by one of the most respected investment advisers in the world today, but he accidentally ended up almost duplicating one of his major criticisms of the mentality of Wall Street: climate change denial or willful ignorance.

He never meant to, of course.  Look at his title!  A point early in his talk was that, while 97% of scientists world-wide agree that human-induced global warming is taking place, the ratio is almost the reverse among Wall Street investment banks, brokers, traders, investors, the financial media, etc.  As an extreme case, consider the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page, with its endless aspersions toward climate science and climate scientists.  What the heck are those monkeys doing?  Idiots.  Hypocrites, too.  Rupert Murdoch and his editors at the “J” have their trembling tongues so deep in the honey pot of the fossil fuel complex that they’ll do anything to keep them sweet.  And then of course go home to their swank estates in Greenwich and Darien fully aware that the climatologists are probably right.  They are not fools.  But their 1% incomes tell them to shut up about global warming and get with Exxon Mobil’s and Peabody Energy’s program.  Which means keeping Wall Street a truth-free zone as far as climate is concerned.  Beware of people who are paid handsomely to give the truth a wide berth.

Jeremy G. is to be forgiven.  Time was limited, and he became so heavily focused on potential food scarcity, peak oil, mined phosphate and potassium depletion, and population growth that he never got to climate.  There’s enough to be worried about anyway.  But in their eager haste to always sound climatologically correct in front of their bribers, and in passing the contagion along to their even more obedient supplicants in Congress, the Wall Street establishment is doing the 99% a vast, ominous disservice, and you can bet your bottom dollar (which is probably all you have left) that the Masters of the Universe will have better means than you or I to adjust to the consequences of climate change.  Country home near Chicoutimi, anyone?  I hear there’s a new Friday evening shuttle leaving from the Midtown Skyport!

Wonder if that MBA Oath is starting to make a difference…  After all, Wall Street probably has the highest MBA density of anywhere in the world (measured in MBAs per cubic centimeter).  Don’t MBA programs these days emphasize realism, accuracy, and truth?!  (Or is that only when there’s a big payoff at the end?)

Promise #5 of the Oath is:

“•  I will protect the right of future generations to advance their standard of living and enjoy a healthy planet.”

As of today, 6,426 MBAs have sworn their fealty.  Hm.  That’s about 6% of all MBA enrollments in the US, annually.  Considering the Oath has been around for 3 years, and that there are non-US signers, we can guess that perhaps 1% of annual MBA grads stake their self-respect, reputations, and honor before God and (wo)man upon dutifully carrying out Promise Number 5 above, which they are of course doing.  The other 99% (a different 99%, please note) thus continue to swindle and shill, rogues of the hydrocarbon bosses, unannointed and unprotected by the goodness of the Fellowship of the Oath.

We have to save them, so they do us right!  Let the truth prevail.  Let them ALL swear the Oath, dedicate themselves to scientific truth and a healthy planet, and stand with the 97% (of climate scientists), so that people like Jeremy Grantham don’t have to continue revealing such a pathetic, pathologically criminal state of affairs.

That should be enough, right?

OccupyMBA!

 

 

 

What do YOU want?

POLL: What should an MBA program dedicated to social justice, economic democracy, ecological responsibility and sustainability include or emphasize?

Tell the world what you think.

“I didn’t want to be like them”

I heard two very similar comments from MBA students in our program recently – each a smart, high-achieving young woman who is just completing our degree after two years of excellent performance.  The comments are very telling.

“Mary,” who worked as a marketing manager in the financial sector prior to enrolling in our MBA program:  ”I felt I might want to go to graduate school, but I never wanted an MBA.  I mean, all my colleagues had MBAs, and I looked around at them and thought, there is no way I want to be like them.”

“Elizabeth,” who has worked as a project and product manager for a global energy company for more than a decade:  ”I never wanted an MBA.  I don’t even like business!  I didn’t know there were alternative MBA programs out there.”

You have to ask yourself: are all the wrong people going to get MBA degrees, and all the right people staying away?

Present company excepted, of course… ;-)